Privileged Americans may not be aware of the entire monster that operates each tentacle. We usually find only one tentacle. It might be anything:
WOMEN’S RIGHTS
AFRICAN AMERICANS RIGHTS
LATINO’S RIGHTS
GAY RIGHTS
ECONOMIC LOSS
POLITICAL PERSECUTION
This could go on and on. For me personally, my first tentacle was the mistreatment of children in schools. When I first became a teacher, I reacted strongly to the corporal punishment that was common in those days. I’m glad to say that the “good guys” largely won that battle, at least in major metropolitan schools.
I went so far as to start a private school dedicated to non-coercion. They were called “free schools” in those days. When I learned that Danish schools already eschewed corporal punishment, I named mine “Lille Skole.”
But even before I started the school, the Houston police murdered civil rights activist Carl Hampton. I was forced to learn a lot from that. Then there was the war in Vietnam, which I had been trying hard to ignore. I remember thinking that even if my idealistic notion of raising better children came true, America would have to stop me because they still needed young people to go to Vietnam and my students, obviously, wouldn’t do it.
Lille Skole nearly killed me. After nearly 3 years of constant hassle with parents, finances, and government rules, I was a wreck. But I didn’t quit. I found other ways, many of them just as ill-advised as Lille Skole, to go on trying to make a better world. I’m 85 now, and still trying.
That’s the Trick
Those who stay in the fight, even against their one tentacle, will eventually find the monster. It’s the same one. Only the tentacles are different.
A lot of people experience their one tentacle. Millions of young people, for example, opposed the war in Vietnam. But that was as far as many of them ever went. They didn’t inquire successfully into the causes of war, or of racism, or of homophobia, or of any of the other tentacles.
But people get distracted. They get burnt out. One way or another, they get discouraged. What is more pathetic than hearing some old dude say, “I used to be full of vinegar, but I learned.” What they learned was defeat.
I think it’s true that we’ll never argue our way into solidarity. At the same time, I think that history is teaching all of us. Those willing to stay in the fight will eventually recognize the monster and then embark on the greatest intellectual challenge of anybody’s life: how do we defeat the monster?
–Gene Lantz
You can hear me every Saturday at 9 on knon.org or 89.3FM in Dallas. I’ve put my more personal thoughts on http://lilleskole.us
I’ve been starting arguments about when capitalism went bad. I haven’t won any.
One reply is “When was it ever good?” Using common sense, which is the accumulation of our personal experiences, the conclusion is obvious: “capitalism is no danged good and never was.” But common sense, while nearly always correct, isn’t always adequate for analysis.
Another interesting reply was “It depends on your point of view.” I think that person was saying that things have always been bad for people of color and that the particular stages of economic circumstances haven’t made any difference. There’s a lot of truth there, but it’s a subjective and ahistorical view. Also, it’s easily disproved because “people of color” ruled vast empires in some periods.
I suppose I realized that capitalism used to be a good thing while reading Frederick Engels’ Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. He relied on the work of another anthropologist to show that capitalism ended serfdom. The so-called “free” workers under capitalism had better lives than they did when they were serfs.
Some of the people I talked to were confused about chattel slavery in the American South. One guy said that it was the “heyday of slavery.” I had to interrupt this one, because the heyday of slavery was clearly in olden times when slaves were captives instead of chattel property. The Romans had so many slaves that they lived in terror of a slave takeover, and Spartacus nearly gave them one.
It’s true that the Southern slaveholders were capitalists, but it’s also true that the productive power of Northern capitalists was the main factor in winning that war. One could make a good argument that Southern slaves freed themselves, but it would still be true that they were better off afterward as so-called “free” workers.
I never argued that capitalists were good people. As far as I’m concerned they have about the same morality as the Tsar, Hitler, or any autocrat. That’s not the point. The point is that quality of life improved for those who had been serfs and became laborers under capitalism. They could quit their jobs and serfs couldn’t.
The reason that capitalists conquered everybody else was their productive power. They could produce more commodities and make them cheaper. Maybe they didn’t have any intention of improving anybody’s quality of life, but they did all the same.
When Did Capitalism Change?
So far, I’ve found only one person who agreed that capitalism improved standards of living at one time, but doesn’t do it now. He thought the change came at the beginning of the 19th century. I asked if he was basing his guess on the slave uprising in Haiti, but he said that wasn’t it. I think his guess was somehow based on military changes, not the economic changes I was looking for.
I believe that capitalism generally improved its subjects’ standards of living until the 20th century. At that time, they had pretty well completed their takeover of all the world’s territories. There were still plenty of kings and emperors, but the power had gone to the capitalists. Their problem was that they had nowhere else to expand, and they have to expand.
So they started their first world war. I think that having millions die or get crippled in war, and having even more die from the so-called “Spanish” flu, put a big dent in the overall standard of living. Afterward, the winners had big improvements in their standards of living, but the losers certainly didn’t.
Also, World War I didn’t offer any long term economic solution. Even the winners were in crisis soon enough, and another world war, this one originated by capitalists desperate enough to turn to fascism, resulted. These awful wars and the resultant inequality were a real drag on standards of living.
Americans were winners in both wars. Winning distorted our understanding of the historical process. Also, Americans don’t know much honest international history. If we did, we would know that war has been almost perpetual for the United States in the 20th and 21st centuries. We would also know that a general worldwide economic crisis has been evident.
If we understood our history and its underlying economic causes a little better, maybe we could avoid the coming fascist dictatorship and perpetual war that is trending now, in 2026.
–Gene Lantz
I’m on KNON.org 89.3FM in Dallas every Saturday at 9AM. I speak every where I’m allowed. I put my personal stuff on http://lilleskole.us.
How Deep in Dictatorship Have We Sunk? Can we still get out of this?
Why Are the Billionaires Choosing Dictatorship?
Wouldn’t they rather continue the way they did things 1945-present? The fact is that they can’t. Economic pressures have become too strong. Their competitors, who were devastated in World War II, are back in serious competition. Nations that were never competitors, especially China and India, are a big problem for America’s billionaires now. Nations who have oil or other important resources are trying to hold on to them. Worst of all for the billionaires, the U.S. dollar is being undermined.
The capitalists of each nation have to keep their profits up, and the only way to do that is to expand. They reached a similar situation in 1914 and again in 1939. Both of those situations resulted in world wars. The billionaires prefer another world war, even with nuclear weapons, rather than continuing to see their power diminish.
There are really only two choices before us: destructive wars and ecological suicide on the one hand and a new cooperative spirit among people. The wealthy people who are on top today don’t like that “cooperative spirit” idea at all. So the Trumpsters are taking the only road they consider open to them: fascism.
FASCISM IS INTERNATIONAL
This week, Trump strengthened ties with kings in Sandi Arabia and Morocco while his relationships with western democracies withers. Secy of state Marco Rubio gathered 60 countries for an anti-communist convention. Elon Musk dishes out money and encouragement to fascist parties around the world.
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: OBSTACLE TO FASCISM
Judge Barbara Lynn wrote an excellent op-ed in the Dallas newspaper. Her title was “Beware of how President Trump is gathering power.” The Supreme Court gave Trump unprecedented power and unprecedented immunity. He’s also taken a lot of power with various Executive Orders such as “National Security Presidential Memorandum 7” which intends to give him the power to arrest anybody who disagrees with him.
Lynn also talks about Presidential Emergency Action Documents (PEADS) which can be written in advance and implemented quickly. Neither Congress nor anybody outside the Trumpsters knows what’s in the current PEADS. Lynn says, “They are widely thought to include the authority to detail dangerous persons, impose martial law, seize property, censor the news, suspend the writ of habeas corpus and establish areas for confinement of persons by the military.”
Impose martial law? Isn’t that exactly what the Trumpsters are likely to do if they lose the November elections? Is there any other possibility?
I wrote a letter to the editor, even though I have no expectation that it will be published: “Thanks to Judge Lynn for summarizing some of the ways that the Trumpsters are imposing dictatorship on America. If they lose the November elections, as is widely expected, then it is a certainty that they will try to overthrow whatever restraints are left on them. The people will beat them by organizing, and we have no better opportunity than by joining the protest organizations when the Trumpsters are in Dallas September 9-10.”
If Judge Lynn had wanted to write book-length, she could have also talked about the way that the Trumpsters are taking over information sources. How they have undermined elections and are undermining them still. She could talk about the obvious comparisons between the legions of ICE operatives on our street and state police from earlier fascist governments. She could talk about the way that resistance in the upper echelons of the military have been removed. She could possibly write two books on the Trumpster’s wars and hostile takeovers around the world.
At least several chapters could be devoted to the way that the Trumpsters have restored the racism, homophobia, Islamophobia, and other divisive techniques from earlier centuries and other fascist regimes.
Unprecedented Surveillance
And Judge Lynn could talk about surveillance of American citizens. This brings me to the scandal of this week. We are just beginning to find out about Automated License Plate Readers, ALPRs. Mostly, people call them Flock cameras because a corporation misnamed Flock Safety has produced and sold the biggest bunch of the more than 125,000 of them operating in our cities today.
I probably wouldn’t have even thought about them if the Dallas newspaper hadn’t run an article about somebody who apparently used a pipe cutter to bring 6 or 7 of them down. I immediately thought of the 1960s movie hero “Cool Hand Luke.” In the beginning scene of the film, Luke used a pipe cutter to cut the heads off a series of parking meters. Parking meters were a symbol of government oppression back in those days. How I wish they were all we had to deal with now.
Most of the cameras are on poles strategically placed in high-traffic areas. They read license plates and distinguishing features of automobiles. The excuse given is that they help deter crimes, but the information they gather is shared with any number of government agencies, including the dreaded ICE.
Old timers from the Vietnam war days can tell you that FBI agents regularly walked around in parking lots near anti-war meetings. They were jotting down the license numbers. That’s how important a few license numbers are to the government’s repressive forces.
The cameras aren’t restricted to poles. They mount them on drones so they can snoop around everywhere. And what do they do with the information? Well, individual police can use the info for personal vendettas. According to the Dallas newspaper, they tracked a woman to the Colorado border in order to charge her with leaving Texas to get an abortion. When the scandal broke, they didn’t file the charges, but they could have because they had the information.
The Dallas paper said, “Dallas police conducted more than 800,000 searches of its Flock Safety data in 2025…. In 2025, almost 5,000 other agencies nationwide tapped into Dallas’ network of Flock cameras 10.3 million times… There are 670 Flock cameras across the city.”
The makers of surveillance cameras assert that they are not using facial recognition. But it is obvious that they could. Some of them already detect any Bluetooth activity that passes by them, and Bluetooth devices such as hearing aids or cell phones have personal identifiers.
Deflock.org says there are over 125,000 surveillance cameras operating in the nation. Their web site can show you where. In my area, deflockdfw.org lists city council and other local government meetings where people can protest against government surveillance.
How Deep?
We are very deep in dictatorship indeed. Assuming that the Trumpsters lose the November, 2026, elections, then unprecedented things will happen in American politics. One can understand what will happen, but not from American history. You have to look at Nazi Germany.
–gene lantz
I’m on KNON radio 89.3FM at 9AM Central Time every Saturday. If you are interested in my more personal observations, you might look at https://lilleskole.us
genelantz 